Underground Usa

In the shadow of America’s crumbling urban cores, where sirens wail like a perpetual dirge and law-abiding citizens huddle behind bolted doors, a simple truth pierces the fog of hysteria: increased federal law enforcement presence in cities like Chicago, Washington, DC, and Portland should terrify no one—except the criminals who thrive in chaos.Yet, here we are, in October 2025, watching a parade of virtue-signaling, elitist politicians and their activist enablers clutching pearls over the sight of federal agents in tactical gear. “How dare the feds step in to restore order!” It’s as if these critics believe safety is a privilege reserved for the elite, while the rest of us must endure the fallout from their failed experiments in “progressive” policing. Spare us the crocodile tears; this isn’t oppression—it’s overdue reinforcement of the law for communities gasping under the weight of unchecked violence.Let’s dismantle the absurd objections with cold facts.Federal law enforcement agencies, from the FBI to the

In 1999, two scheming colonels in the People’s Liberation Army, Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui, penned Unrestricted Warfare, a venomous manifesto masquerading as military theory. This book lays bare the Communist Chinese Party’s (CCP) ruthless ambition: to dismantle the United States not through conventional battles, but via a shadowy, all-encompassing assault on every pillar of American society.This doctrine fuels the CCP’s ongoing hybrid war, blending economic sabotage, cyber intrusions, cultural poison, and more to erode U.S. supremacy. The CCP, a tyrannical regime built on oppression, coercion, and deceit, views America as its prime obstacle to global domination. Their strategy exploits Western openness while shielding their own ruthless, iron-fisted control, aided by naive and complicit supporters in international business, academia, and politics who prioritize profit over principle.Economically, the CCP wields unrestricted warfare like a blunt instrument to cripple America’s prosperity. Through predatory

Let’s talk about something that’s at the heart of what makes a free society tick and something the toxic-Left seems not to understand: Natural Law Rights. These rights aren’t just some dusty philosophical concept; they’re the foundation of everything we hold dear about freedom. And let me be blunt—those who roll their eyes at this idea or, worse, push against it are playing a dangerous game. They’re not just wrong; they’re setting the stage for a world where liberty gets trampled. Natural Law Rights are non-negotiable, and dismissing them is a one-way ticket to tyranny.First off, what’s Natural Law? It’s not some arcane legal jargon. Think of it as the basic, universal truth that every human has certain rights just because they’re human—life, liberty, property, free speech, the right to protect yourself. These aren’t handouts from a government; they’re baked into our existence, whether you see them as coming from a Higher Power or just plain reason.Philosophers like John Locke and Thomas Aquinas hashed this o

In recent years, I have come to realize that I have become intolerant of the intolerant and the intolerable. You know the people I am talking about: the fear-porn affected, mask-wearing Karens and their cuckolded, feminized male counterparts who immediately call you a racist, xenophobe, and/or any other kind of “phobe” they can conjure whenever they don’t get their way all the time. The type of people who have no concept of individualism, or “live and let live”; the type of person who narced on their neighbor for having family over for Thanksgiving during the farce that was the COVID pandemic.Well, I’m here to say that I—and I suspect an overwhelming majority of people both here in the US and across the free world—are done with this overbearing, aggressive bullshit and have ceased being stigmatized by the labels they hurl.I strongly suspect, after conversation with people from around the country (and the world, actually), that this awakening isn't just personal; I sense it is a collective backlash against the

American political history is full of cautionary tales about parties that crashed and burned because they got too extreme, too divided, or just couldn’t keep up with the times. Think of the Federalists, the Whigs, or smaller players like the Liberty Party—they all fell apart when they doubled down on rigid ideas or let infighting take over.Right now, the Democrat Party is staring down a similar cliff, dragged toward the edge by neo-Marxist progressives who are obsessed with ideological purity, identity politics, and rhetoric that divides more than it unites. Add to that the Left’s troubling history with inflammatory propaganda and political violence—including high-profile assassinations—and you’ve got a recipe for a party in serious trouble, not to mention a nation teetering on the brink of chaos.Back in the 1790s, the Federalists tanked because their elitist, pro-British stance turned off everyday voters. They loved to paint their opponents as wild-eyed radicals, setting the stage for divisive political atta

The division in the United States, the ideological and political division, has reached an untenable level. With one faction growing increasingly comfortable with confrontation and violence as its preferred method of conflict resolution, we are slowly reaching the Rubicon of fracture. We simply cannot continue down this path without threatening a rupture in our society that will end the Republic as we know it.The political assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk was a lethal byproduct of a society that has allowed itself to be manipulated by ideological and political charlatans and opportunists, and desensitized to violence on the whole. This has resulted in our one faction in our communities becoming jadedly divided to the point of accepting violence.It’s quite difficult to deny this as a fact. Kirk, whether you agreed with his positions on any number of issues, made his name by engaging in the debate arena; in appearances and on platforms where he would use words, not fists, knives, or guns, to p

In an era where social media amplifies every petty grievance, the "Karen" archetype (and this embodies men and women, but it seems to be more prevalent among females for the feminization of the American male over the years) has become the poster child for unchecked narcissism and entitlement.Picture her: the middle-aged woman with a bob haircut and a perpetual scowl, demanding the world bend to her whims. This isn't just a meme; it's a symptom of a deeper malaise—self-absorption so profound it borders on sociopathy. Arrogance drips from her every demand, convinced the universe owes her. Overblown entitlement convinces her that rules are for others, and narcissism blinds her to the humanity around her.This mindset isn't harmless; it's a poison eroding the sense of community that once defined American life. From neighborhood barbecues to national pastimes like baseball, the "Karen" ethos prioritizes "me" over "we," turning shared spaces into battlegrounds of ego. And nowhere was this more disgustingly on displa

In today's America, the toxic-Left—embodied by Democrat activists, progressive academics, and self-proclaimed social justice warriors—peddles a poisonous worldview that divides society into rigid camps: the oppressed and the oppressors. This binary isn't some fresh invention born of genuine empathy; it's a direct descendant of Marxist ideology, repackaged to erode the core American values of individualism, self-sufficiency, and self-responsibility.What began as Karl Marx's economic class struggle has metastasized into a cultural weapon wielded by the Left to foster perpetual victimhood, justify mob rule, and dismantle the merit-based society that made America exceptional. The result? A nation teetering on the brink of collectivist tyranny, where personal achievement is vilified as "privilege" and group grievances trump individual rights.To understand this threat, we must trace its origins back to Marxism's foundational texts. In The Communist Manifesto (1848), Marx and Engels declared that "the history of all

The streets of Chicago are bleeding, and the Democrat leadership, led by Chicago Teachers Union lackey, Mayor Brandon Johnson, seems content to let the city drown in its own bloody chaos. Over the Labor Day weekend of 2025—and I am writing this on Sunday, so this number will rise, at least 50 people were shot, eight fatally, in a relentless wave of violence that has become all too familiar in this once-great city.These numbers are not mere statistics; they are a grim testament to the failure of Democrat policies that prioritize political posturing over the safety of citizens. From Chicago to Los Angeles, New York to Philadelphia, urban America is under a murderous siege, and the Democrats in charge are complicit in the carnage.In Chicago, the epicenter of this urban decay, the weekend’s violence included a woman shot dead in a South Shore apartment and two men gunned down in East Garfield Park by a suspect emerging from a dark SUV. These incidents are not isolated; they are part of a broader pattern of bloods

In 1796, George Washington warned in his Farewell Address that the rise of political factions could tear apart the young Republic, predicting that "the spirit of party" would lead to "cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men" manipulating the system for power, fostering division and eroding trust in governance. His words ring alarmingly true today as hyper-partisan gerrymandering, particularly by the Left in states like California, New York, Illinois, and Maryland, threatens the democratic process. While both political extremes engage in this practice, the aggressive tactics of leftist-led redistricting in 2025 exemplify a dangerous escalation, undermining fair representation and fueling political tribalism.Gerrymandering, the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor one party, distorts the will of the electorate. In 2025, California’s Democrat leadership, under Governor Gavin Newsom, has pushed a brazen plan to redraw the state’s 52 congressional districts to secure at least five additional Dem

The grand experiment of globalism, long championed by unelected elites and their sprawling bureaucratic empires, is unraveling. The World Economic Forum (WEF), that self-anointed arbiter of humanity’s future, has spent decades peddling a vision of interconnected economies, homogenized cultures, and centralized control under the guise of progress. But the cracks in their utopian facade are now impossible to ignore.From the rejection of their “woke capitalism” to the resurgence of nationalism and individualism, societies worldwide are pushing back against the globalist agenda. This shift, far from a mere pendulum swing, signals a profound awakening—one that prioritizes sovereignty, self-determination, and the individual over the collectivist dogma of globalist institutions.The WEF’s vision, cloaked in buzzwords like “sustainability” and “inclusivity,” has always been about control. Their annual Davos gatherings, where billionaires and bureaucrats sip champagne while plotting the world’s future, have produced li

The United States, a Constitutional Republic forged in the fires of liberty and individual rights, stands as a beacon of omnicultural unity—a nation where people of every background unite under shared values, not divide into petty distinctions of tribe or creed. Yet, a sinister force threatens to tear this noble experiment apart: multicultural tribalism.This ideology, with its insidious emphasis on group identity over individual merit, is a dagger aimed at the heart of our Republic. It fractures our unity, fuels resentment, and opens the door to the creeping poison of Marxism. Make no mistake—multicultural tribalism is not just misguided; it is a dangerous betrayal of everything that makes America exceptional.At its core, multicultural tribalism rejects the “melting pot” ideal that has defined America’s strength. Instead of a nation bound by common principles, it pushes a fractured vision of competing ethnic, racial, gender-based, and cultural factions, each clamoring for supremacy. The 2020 Census revealed t

On August 3, 2025, over 50 Texas House Democrats fled the state to block a Republican-led effort to redraw congressional maps during a special legislative session called by Governor Greg Abbott. This dramatic walkout, designed to deny the quorum needed for legislative business, represents a profound betrayal of their constituents, their oaths of office, and the principles of a republican government.By abandoning their posts in Austin, these lawmakers have silenced the voices of their voters, shirked their constitutional responsibilities, invited removal from office, and established a dangerous precedent of mob rule by a small faction. Their actions undermine the very democratic process they claim to defend, raising serious questions about the integrity of representative governance.The Texas House requires a two-thirds quorum—100 of its 150 members—to conduct business. With at least 51 Democrats fleeing to states like Illinois, New York, and Massachusetts, the legislature is paralyzed, halting not only redistr

In a nation built on justice and the rule of law, the absence of consequences for political wrongdoing—or any wrongdoing, for that matter—is a betrayal that undermines our Republic’s foundation. When elites orchestrate hoaxes, enable foreign espionage, shield criminal aliens, fund chaos in our streets, or facilitate the trafficking of innocents, they fracture trust, empower enemies, and endanger lives.Without swift, severe punishment, these perpetrators invite anarchy, corruption, and national decline. The consequences of impunity are many: weakened institutions, emboldened adversaries, and a society where the powerful prey on the vulnerable. Accountability must be enforced, or America will crumble under the weight of unpunished treachery.Take, for instance, the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, which stands as a grotesque abuse of power. In this calculated scheme, the Clinton campaign, with complicity from Obama and Biden, fabricated ties between Trump and Russia. They used the discredited Steele Dossier to manip

In the cesspool of modern American politics, the Democrat Party stands as a monument to moral bankruptcy, a once-proud institution now reduced to a vacuous entity that stands for absolutely nothing—except the relentless pursuit of power at any cost.Led by spineless opportunists and infiltrated by the toxic-Left's radical ideologues, today's Democrats have abandoned any pretense of principle, embracing, instead, a toxic brew of obstructionism, corruption, and outright Marxism. This isn't hyperbole; it's the grim reality staring us in the face as we hurtle toward national self-destruction.The party's leadership, from the geriatric puppet-masters like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi to the shadowy Deep State enablers, has transformed the Democrats into a machine of deceit and division, all while virtue-signaling about "democracy" and "justice."Take, for instance, the shameless obstructionism orchestrated by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a man whose career epitomizes the Democrat ethos of "rules for thee,

In today's polarized discourse, the word "racism" is hurled like confetti at a parade—ubiquitous, colorful, but ultimately empty. What was once a grave accusation denoting systemic hatred and discrimination has been so overused, falsely applied, and abused by the toxic Left that it has lost all meaning. This isn't an accident; it's a calculated strategy to sow division and consolidate power.As critics warn, labeling everything "racist" renders the term meaningless, cheapening genuine instances of bigotry. Critics echo this, arguing that incessant cries of "racism" have desensitized society, making it harder to address real prejudice when it does occur. The result is a society where legitimate victims are drowned out by opportunistic noise.Consider the litany of false accusations peddled by the Left:* In 2024, Kate Oh, a senior policy counsel at the ACLU, was fired after being accused of using racist language targeting people of color in the workplace. Oh denied the allegations, and a federal judge ruled that

The MAGA movement, fueled by pride in what America can once again be and a rejection of elitist betrayal, has propelled Republicans to control Congress and the White House. This triumph, born from grassroots outrage against Washington's corrupt swamp, presents the party with a historic opportunity to purge the system of its toxins.Yet, power exposes true character. If Republicans squander this MAGA-forged mandate by failing to deliver on the promises that brought them to power—much like they did in betraying the Tea Party, they will incinerate their political capital, betraying the American people and hurling the party into an abyss darker than the Democrats' self-inflicted exile.The electorate, awakened by MAGA's clarion call, demands action—not excuses—from those who dare to call themselves reformers.Crucially—like the Reagan Revolution and the Tea Party after that, the MAGA movement isn't only about Donald Trump; it transcends him. So, too, it is not about the Republican Party; it eclipses it. The MAGA mov

The stench of scandal surrounding Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party has grown impossible to ignore, thanks to a bombshell House Intelligence Committee report declassified last week by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. This long-suppressed document, dated September 18, 2020, and locked away in a CIA vault until now, exposes a sordid tale of Russian intelligence gathering compromising material on Clinton—material that Vladimir Putin allegedly planned to weaponize against her had she won the 2016 presidential election.The revelations not only shred the Democrats’ sanctimonious narrative about Russian interference but also lay bare the hypocrisy and machinations of the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration, which colluded to peddle a fabricated Russia-Trump hoax while ignoring their own vulnerabilities.The report, spearheaded by former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) and championed for release by current Chairman Rick Crawford (R-AR), paints a damning picture.

In a stunning vindication of long-held conservative suspicions, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified explosive documents on July 18, 2025, exposing the Obama administration's deliberate fabrication of intelligence to sabotage Donald Trump's 2016 election victory and presidency. This "Russia hoax," as rightly dubbed by President Trump, was no mere bureaucratic error but a calculated deep-state conspiracy orchestrated by neo-Marxist elites to undermine the will of the American people.From a constitutionalist perspective, this assault on our Constitution dwarfs any prior scandal, threatening the very foundations of our Republic. All Americans—Left, Center, and Right—must demand accountability to preserve the Separation of Powers, the rule of law, and the electoral integrity that our Founders enshrined.The declassified memo reveals a December 9, 2016, meeting directed by Barack Obama himself, where top officials twisted pre-election intelligence— which confirmed no Russian cyber interferen

In a bombshell release of declassified documents, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has exposed the rotten core of Barack Obama's presidency: a calculated, deceitful campaign to fabricate Russian interference in the 2016 election. This wasn't mere incompetence from Obama and his cabal of sycophants in the national security apparatus—it was a brazen assault on democracy itself.Obama's team, including the likes of Susan Rice, John Kerry, and Loretta Lynch, along with intelligence hacks like James Clapper and John Brennan, appear to have twisted facts, suppressed truths, and peddled lies to undermine Donald Trump's legitimate victory. The intelligence community under Obama? A nest of partisan vipers who prioritized political sabotage over national security.Let's rewind to the raw intelligence before Obama's fingerprints smeared it all.In the run-up to the 2016 election, assessments from across the board—the CIA, FBI, NSA, DHS, and more—flatly concluded that Russia hadn't meddled in a way that swaye