Underground Usa

The grand experiment of globalism, long championed by unelected elites and their sprawling bureaucratic empires, is unraveling. The World Economic Forum (WEF), that self-anointed arbiter of humanity’s future, has spent decades peddling a vision of interconnected economies, homogenized cultures, and centralized control under the guise of progress. But the cracks in their utopian facade are now impossible to ignore.From the rejection of their “woke capitalism” to the resurgence of nationalism and individualism, societies worldwide are pushing back against the globalist agenda. This shift, far from a mere pendulum swing, signals a profound awakening—one that prioritizes sovereignty, self-determination, and the individual over the collectivist dogma of globalist institutions.The WEF’s vision, cloaked in buzzwords like “sustainability” and “inclusivity,” has always been about control. Their annual Davos gatherings, where billionaires and bureaucrats sip champagne while plotting the world’s future, have produced li

The United States, a Constitutional Republic forged in the fires of liberty and individual rights, stands as a beacon of omnicultural unity—a nation where people of every background unite under shared values, not divide into petty distinctions of tribe or creed. Yet, a sinister force threatens to tear this noble experiment apart: multicultural tribalism.This ideology, with its insidious emphasis on group identity over individual merit, is a dagger aimed at the heart of our Republic. It fractures our unity, fuels resentment, and opens the door to the creeping poison of Marxism. Make no mistake—multicultural tribalism is not just misguided; it is a dangerous betrayal of everything that makes America exceptional.At its core, multicultural tribalism rejects the “melting pot” ideal that has defined America’s strength. Instead of a nation bound by common principles, it pushes a fractured vision of competing ethnic, racial, gender-based, and cultural factions, each clamoring for supremacy. The 2020 Census revealed t

On August 3, 2025, over 50 Texas House Democrats fled the state to block a Republican-led effort to redraw congressional maps during a special legislative session called by Governor Greg Abbott. This dramatic walkout, designed to deny the quorum needed for legislative business, represents a profound betrayal of their constituents, their oaths of office, and the principles of a republican government.By abandoning their posts in Austin, these lawmakers have silenced the voices of their voters, shirked their constitutional responsibilities, invited removal from office, and established a dangerous precedent of mob rule by a small faction. Their actions undermine the very democratic process they claim to defend, raising serious questions about the integrity of representative governance.The Texas House requires a two-thirds quorum—100 of its 150 members—to conduct business. With at least 51 Democrats fleeing to states like Illinois, New York, and Massachusetts, the legislature is paralyzed, halting not only redistr

In a nation built on justice and the rule of law, the absence of consequences for political wrongdoing—or any wrongdoing, for that matter—is a betrayal that undermines our Republic’s foundation. When elites orchestrate hoaxes, enable foreign espionage, shield criminal aliens, fund chaos in our streets, or facilitate the trafficking of innocents, they fracture trust, empower enemies, and endanger lives.Without swift, severe punishment, these perpetrators invite anarchy, corruption, and national decline. The consequences of impunity are many: weakened institutions, emboldened adversaries, and a society where the powerful prey on the vulnerable. Accountability must be enforced, or America will crumble under the weight of unpunished treachery.Take, for instance, the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, which stands as a grotesque abuse of power. In this calculated scheme, the Clinton campaign, with complicity from Obama and Biden, fabricated ties between Trump and Russia. They used the discredited Steele Dossier to manip

In the cesspool of modern American politics, the Democrat Party stands as a monument to moral bankruptcy, a once-proud institution now reduced to a vacuous entity that stands for absolutely nothing—except the relentless pursuit of power at any cost.Led by spineless opportunists and infiltrated by the toxic-Left's radical ideologues, today's Democrats have abandoned any pretense of principle, embracing, instead, a toxic brew of obstructionism, corruption, and outright Marxism. This isn't hyperbole; it's the grim reality staring us in the face as we hurtle toward national self-destruction.The party's leadership, from the geriatric puppet-masters like Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi to the shadowy Deep State enablers, has transformed the Democrats into a machine of deceit and division, all while virtue-signaling about "democracy" and "justice."Take, for instance, the shameless obstructionism orchestrated by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a man whose career epitomizes the Democrat ethos of "rules for thee,

In today's polarized discourse, the word "racism" is hurled like confetti at a parade—ubiquitous, colorful, but ultimately empty. What was once a grave accusation denoting systemic hatred and discrimination has been so overused, falsely applied, and abused by the toxic Left that it has lost all meaning. This isn't an accident; it's a calculated strategy to sow division and consolidate power.As critics warn, labeling everything "racist" renders the term meaningless, cheapening genuine instances of bigotry. Critics echo this, arguing that incessant cries of "racism" have desensitized society, making it harder to address real prejudice when it does occur. The result is a society where legitimate victims are drowned out by opportunistic noise.Consider the litany of false accusations peddled by the Left:* In 2024, Kate Oh, a senior policy counsel at the ACLU, was fired after being accused of using racist language targeting people of color in the workplace. Oh denied the allegations, and a federal judge ruled that

The MAGA movement, fueled by pride in what America can once again be and a rejection of elitist betrayal, has propelled Republicans to control Congress and the White House. This triumph, born from grassroots outrage against Washington's corrupt swamp, presents the party with a historic opportunity to purge the system of its toxins.Yet, power exposes true character. If Republicans squander this MAGA-forged mandate by failing to deliver on the promises that brought them to power—much like they did in betraying the Tea Party, they will incinerate their political capital, betraying the American people and hurling the party into an abyss darker than the Democrats' self-inflicted exile.The electorate, awakened by MAGA's clarion call, demands action—not excuses—from those who dare to call themselves reformers.Crucially—like the Reagan Revolution and the Tea Party after that, the MAGA movement isn't only about Donald Trump; it transcends him. So, too, it is not about the Republican Party; it eclipses it. The MAGA mov

The stench of scandal surrounding Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party has grown impossible to ignore, thanks to a bombshell House Intelligence Committee report declassified last week by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. This long-suppressed document, dated September 18, 2020, and locked away in a CIA vault until now, exposes a sordid tale of Russian intelligence gathering compromising material on Clinton—material that Vladimir Putin allegedly planned to weaponize against her had she won the 2016 presidential election.The revelations not only shred the Democrats’ sanctimonious narrative about Russian interference but also lay bare the hypocrisy and machinations of the Clinton campaign and the Obama administration, which colluded to peddle a fabricated Russia-Trump hoax while ignoring their own vulnerabilities.The report, spearheaded by former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) and championed for release by current Chairman Rick Crawford (R-AR), paints a damning picture.

In a stunning vindication of long-held conservative suspicions, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified explosive documents on July 18, 2025, exposing the Obama administration's deliberate fabrication of intelligence to sabotage Donald Trump's 2016 election victory and presidency. This "Russia hoax," as rightly dubbed by President Trump, was no mere bureaucratic error but a calculated deep-state conspiracy orchestrated by neo-Marxist elites to undermine the will of the American people.From a constitutionalist perspective, this assault on our Constitution dwarfs any prior scandal, threatening the very foundations of our Republic. All Americans—Left, Center, and Right—must demand accountability to preserve the Separation of Powers, the rule of law, and the electoral integrity that our Founders enshrined.The declassified memo reveals a December 9, 2016, meeting directed by Barack Obama himself, where top officials twisted pre-election intelligence— which confirmed no Russian cyber interferen

In a bombshell release of declassified documents, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has exposed the rotten core of Barack Obama's presidency: a calculated, deceitful campaign to fabricate Russian interference in the 2016 election. This wasn't mere incompetence from Obama and his cabal of sycophants in the national security apparatus—it was a brazen assault on democracy itself.Obama's team, including the likes of Susan Rice, John Kerry, and Loretta Lynch, along with intelligence hacks like James Clapper and John Brennan, appear to have twisted facts, suppressed truths, and peddled lies to undermine Donald Trump's legitimate victory. The intelligence community under Obama? A nest of partisan vipers who prioritized political sabotage over national security.Let's rewind to the raw intelligence before Obama's fingerprints smeared it all.In the run-up to the 2016 election, assessments from across the board—the CIA, FBI, NSA, DHS, and more—flatly concluded that Russia hadn't meddled in a way that swaye

In an era where free speech is heralded as a cornerstone of democracy, the toxic-Left has perverted the noble act of protest into a cynical, profit-driven enterprise. What many well-meaning Americans defend as grassroots activism is, in reality, a permanent protest industry orchestrated by opportunistic neo-Marxists. These charlatans, hiding behind the veneer of social justice, exploit societal divisions for personal gain and ideological dominance.Far from spontaneous outcries, today's demonstrations are often scripted spectacles, fueled by shadowy funding networks that undermine authentic public discourse. This insidious machinery not only sows chaos but also erodes trust in genuine movements, leaving the average citizen bewildered and vulnerable to manipulation.At the heart of this racket lies "crowds on demand" businesses, where professional agitators are hired to inflate rallies and fabricate outrage. Companies like Crowds on Demand openly advertise services to organize protests, rallies, and advocacy cam

For years, the toxic-Left has peddled a narrative that the political Right is perpetually on the brink of igniting a second US Civil War. They paint conservatives as unhinged, gun-toting extremists ready to tear the nation apart over ideological differences. Yet, the evidence increasingly points to a far more troubling reality: it is the Marxist, toxic-Left itself that is stoking division, anger, and a dangerous appetite for violence verging on the precipice of bloodshed. Recent reporting from Axios, based on interviews with over two dozen House Democrats, exposes a seething undercurrent of rage within the Left’s base—a rage that flirts openly with lawlessness and chaos. And while some believe these admissions are being used as excuses for far-Left Democrat absurdity, the fact remains: the toxic-Left, born of Marxist roots, is aching for violent confrontation.The Left’s accusations against the Right have long been a projection, a smoke-and-mirrors tactic to deflect from their own radical impulses. While they

Our society’s obsession with sex is not a neutral force. The rampant, overt sexualization of culture—celebrated in media, entertainment, and elite circles—has created a fertile ground for predators like Jeffrey Epstein, Sean “Diddy” Combs, and Harvey Weinstein to exploit and abuse women and children. This is not a call to vilify consensual adult sexuality but a condemnation of a culture so permissive that it enables, and even normalizes, the exploitation of the vulnerable.The Epstein case, alongside those of Combs and Weinstein, reveals a grim truth: society’s apathy toward ethical boundaries and its failure to confront human trafficking head-on are complicit in the horrors endured by countless victims.The over-sexualization of our society is a key driver of this abuse. From hyper-sexualized advertising to the glamorization of excess in elite social circles, we’ve normalized a culture where boundaries are eroded and power imbalances are exploited.“When music videos, films, and social media glorify objectifica

In a preface to the points I am about to make, I want to be clear about one thing. I am in full support of each of the measures passed in the One Big Beautiful Bill. In fact, I believe that some provisions didn’t go far enough when it comes to the sovereignty of citizenship and the outrageous amount of taxes that are forced upon the American people. To the latter point, I believe we are at a time in American history where we have returned to the beginning, in terms of taxation. Abolishing the income tax and replacing it with a carefully constrained consumption tax eliminates political corruption and taxes people according to their means better than any progressive income tax ever could.But that’s a subject for another day…The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA), signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4, 2025, was touted as a triumph for American workers, families, and seniors. Packed with tax relief measures and innovative programs, it promised to alleviate financial burdens and champion domestic

Every year, when Independence Day approaches—and you’ll notice I say Independence Day and not “the Fourth of July”—I rewatch the HBO series John Adams. Now, I know historical purists will gravitate towards some of the artistic license in the series, but for the most part, the storyline is true, and the place the viewer is brought to accurately portrays the frustration, danger, and uncertainty the Founding Generation held at hand.While the entire series is absolutely worth watching—and more than appropriately, this week—I have pulled a few of the more memorable moments from the series to illustrate the intensity of what it must have been like to go through those moments in time.We often forget that at the time of the American Revolution, there were no countries that had created a system of government for themselves. Most governments stemmed from monarchies. So the very idea of “liberty,” of a free people establishing a government for themselves, was a foreign idea.But with each aggression perpetrated against t

In the digital age, the battle for public opinion is increasingly fought through sophisticated manipulation tactics orchestrated by nefarious nation-state actors and far-Left non-governmental organizations (NGOs). These entities deploy paid social media influencers, fake accounts, and artificial intelligence (AI) bots to create the illusion of widespread support for their causes, undermining truth and sowing discord. This insidious practice distorts reality, misleads the public, and erodes trust in democratic processes.By examining specific examples—such as the manufactured support for the Islamic Republic of Iran against the United States, the amplification of pro-Hamas and pro-Palestinian narratives in the West, the fabricated backing for anti-ICE demonstrations in the US, the propagandizing of the transgender movement, and the contrived fissures within the MAGA movemen—it is easy to understand why these practices, and those who fund and employ them, should be viciously condemned and exposed for these decep

The significant difference between most Americans and the ideological far-Left is that most Americans can disagree on any given issue and not feel obligated to despise the person with whom they disagree. Many times, those who are not on the lunatic fringe can disagree and still actually like, respect, and even support one another. And so it is that I disagree with President Trump on his easing off the Iranian mullahs without achieving unconditional surrender.To be clear, I am not a supporter of gratuitous war; of optional, nation-building, regime-change conflicts that put American military personnel in harm's way for politically opportune purposes. I believe the US military has been abused and misused in contemporary times, especially at the hands of globalists and political charlatans. The US military should only be employed to confront direct threats to the United States and the vanquishment of true evil.But I argue that both cases exist in the mullahs of the Islamic Republic of Iran, a nation that, for 47

The narrative of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a formidable military force has been peddled for years, amplified by propaganda and echoed by sympathetic global media. Yet, recent Israeli and US strikes have exposed this narrative as flimsy, collapsing under scrutiny. The IRGC’s decimation in these operations reveals a truth long masked by bravado: Iran’s military capabilities, like those of other overhyped regimes in the region, are far less potent than claimed.History provides clear parallels, from Iraq’s collapse in 1991 to Syria’s implosion and the Arab coalition’s humiliation in 1967. When examined, the pattern is unmistakable—boastful regimes, often backed by Russia, consistently fail to deliver on their rhetoric. The narrative of the IRGC’s military strength and the threats from Iran, Russia, China, and North Korea, often referred to as the “Axis Powers,” could very well simply be hollow posturing.The Middle East offers a graveyard of militaries whose reputations were inflated beyon

The Islamic Republic of Iran, under the despotic rule of its theocratic mullahs, stands as a malignant force against the United States, Israel, and the free world. Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, this regime has pursued a relentless campaign of terrorism, oppression, and destabilization, cloaked in religious zeal but driven by an insatiable lust for power and control. Its actions—through proxy terrorist organizations, internal atrocities, dangerous alliances with authoritarian states, and a now-crippled nuclear ambition—mark it as a clear and present danger to global freedom.Ridding the world of this theocratic cancer is not another “forever war,” as some in a small faction of the MAGA movement suggest, but a necessary confrontation with a declared enemy, one whose extinction would unshackle tens of millions, stabilize the Middle East, and bolster global security.The mullahs’ regime has orchestrated a shadow war against the United States and its allies through a sprawling web of proxy terrorist organizatio

The MAGA majority has been a steadfast and righteous voice against the reckless proxy wars that have drained America’s strength—conflicts like those in Iraq, Libya, and, some would argue Ukraine, driven by globalist agendas with little benefit to the United States. Their rejection of gratuitous regime-change schemes and endless military entanglements reflects a deep commitment to prioritizing American interests. Yet, there is a critical distinction between avoiding optional wars and confronting existential threats posed by tyrannical regimes like Iran’s Islamofascist mullahs and Communist China. For a movement built on strength and patriotism, embracing a contemporary form of isolationism in the face of such evil is not just misguided—it’s a borderline betrayal of the values that define America’s greatness.The MAGA base’s distrust of Washington’s war machine is well-earned. Years of betrayal by elites have fueled legitimate skepticism of neo-con-induced foreign conflicts. But retreating into any form of isola