Soteriology 101: Former Calvinistic Professor Discusses Doctrines Of Salvation

As seen on YouTube HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP5kC4ik48I This is a class lecture to be shared with all who may be struggling to understand the clear differences between Southern Baptist Traditionalism and 5-Point Calvinism.   For more please visit www.soteriology101.com

Dan Chapa wrote: Is Calvinism Semi-Pelagian?   Given Mr. Christensen’s definition of Semi-Pelagianism, does Calvinism avoid the charge of Semi-Pelagianism? I will argue that it does not and that Calvinism has serious problems with affirming total depravity. Mr. Christensen states: "The freedom to choose to love God and exercise saving faith is not a problem. Calvinists agree with this in substance as long as freedom of choice is defined as acting willingly or voluntarily in accordance with one's regenerated nature." But this admits that on Calvinism, faith is our act – God does not believe for us. And on Calvinism we are responsible for our actions. So on Calvinism, we are responsible for our faith. So if Arminianism has a problem because man is responsible for faith, so does Calvinism, but in other ways we can see that Calvinism is worse.   On Calvinism, an unregenerate man would believe if they wanted to.3 This sort of freedom (sometimes call compatibilist freedom; other times called natural freedom does n

As we approach Christmas we may ask, Why?  Why did Jesus step out of heaven and into our world? What motivated our God to do that?  Leighton Flowers unpacks 1 Tim. 2:1-6 to reveal the real motivation for the incarnation which brought to pass the first Christmas at just the right time.  So too, it should be the motive of the The Bride of Christ every Christmas: The desire for the salvation of every man, woman, boy and girl! For more go to www.soteriology101.com

Many of you may recall the last couple of shows where I respond to Dale and Drew, two good Calvinistic brothers who have a podcast called "Reformasium." We critiqued each other's views fairly harshly, but we've become quite cordial in our conversations over our differences.  They are in the process of recording another response to my last podcast but in the meanwhile you can listen to our long, but productive, discussion over the doctrines of salvation. For more visit us at www.soteriology101.com

Dr. Sam Storms, pastor of Bridgeway Baptist Church in Oklahoma and serving on the board with Desiring God Ministries, takes a different approach to interpreting 2 Peter 3:9 than many online Calvinists are taking these days.  He also argues that the natural, sinful tendency of mankind is to try and take credit for our salvation which is why many are "Arminians" naturally. Professor Flowers destroys this notion in today's podcast.  Let's dive in.    For more go to www.soteriology101.com

I saw this argument posed by a Christian in a debate with an Atheist recently and it reminded me of an important point. We should always be willing to objectively and honestly ask the question, “What if I’m wrong?” What are the practical, real world consequences if what I believe, teach and practice is in error? When it comes to the soteriological differences between the Calvinist and the Traditionalist, like myself, this question is especially pertinent. If non-Calvinists are wrong, what temporal or eternal harm have we really caused? As I have said before, we are either rightly standing in defense of God’s glory or God has sovereignly determined for us to be wrong for the praise of His glory. If I am mistaken, no fewer people are going to heaven, no less glory will be given to God than what He decided and nothing I do will ultimately harm or hinder the desire of God for this temporal world or the eternal one to come. I literally have nothing practical to gain by converting to Calvinism. And I know if the

Dr. James White is often making the claim that the Corporate View of Election is an "impersonal election of a nameless, faceless group," but of course this is another straw-man fallacy White has employed to try and discredit the perspective. Which view of God's choice is really more impersonal?  The one where the personal names, faces, inclinations, desires, behaviors and morality of the individuals are not in view when the choice is made? Or the one where they are in full view?  You decide.  Let's dive into Ephesians chapter 1.   For more go to www.soteriology101.com

Travis, a "reformed leaning" student attending SWBTS, called in to discuss his own questions about Calvinism and to objectively evaluate his current soteriology as contrasted with Traditionalism.  For more visit us at www.soteriology101.com

Listen in as Leighton Flowers preaches a sermon titled "Defining the Relationship."  He tells his own spiritual journey and unpacks what it means to define our relationship with God even in the midst of doubt.  

Dr. White deals with style over substance, something he would not allow of those who engage with him, so Professor Flowers doesn't let him get away with it either. Listen to Flowers pull apart every tactic Dr. White employees, but with respect and Christ-like love. For more go to www.soteriology101.com

Professor Flowers discusses the various theological approaches to dealing with the problem of evil and suffering in our world.  He responds to a high deterministic Calvinist who engaged with him on his blog article titled: "Does God Bring About the Abuse of Children for His Own Glory?" Here: http://wp.me/p5gZ5t-lE  For more visit www.soteriology101.com

Dr. John Piper is known as the one of the leaders in the modern resurgence of neo-Calvinism.  He is asked if he overemphasizes the so-called 'doctrines of grace' (Calvinism).  His answer presents several points worthy of discussion, the paramount of which is the motive behind making God's glory manifest.  The question is whether Calvinism's worldview is the best systematic in bringing the greatest glory to our God. Let's dive in! Visit us at www.soteriology101.com for more information.

Professor Leighton Flowers responds to Pastor Sean Cole's podcast over the doctrine of Total Inability and the need for the Effectual Calling. In part 2, we deal specifically with the biblical texts that Sean uses to support these Calvinistic views.   For more please visit us at www.soteriology101.com

Professor Leighton Flowers responds to Pastor Sean Cole's podcast over the doctrine of Total Inability and the need for the Effectual Calling.   For more please visit us at www.soteriology101.com

Professor Leighton Flowers has Pastor Sean Cole, a SBC Calvinist, on the show again. This time they specifically discuss Romans 9 and other common proof texts dealing with soteriology.  These two always model a Christlike attitude and graciousness that is all too rare today.  Let's dive in!  This program is also on Prof. Flowers' YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hmxkt290BAE   To join the discussion visit us at www.soteriology101.com   Song: Hey Brother by Aviccii

Dr. James White, of Alpha and Omega Ministries, answered a caller on his most recent program about Prof. Flowers soteriological perspective and today he responds.  White's marginalization tactic is unveiled along with several false presumptions of the caller and Dr. White.  Let's dive in. For more go to www.soteriology101.com

Tony Miano recently apologized for his offensive comments regarding Michael Brown not being saved (kind of) and the Bible Thumping Wingnuts, Len, Andrew and Tim, address this on their show. In their discussion, the old ACCUSATION of MISREPRESENTATION (i.e "you are ignorant of my view") was leveled toward me. I unpack why this strawman fallacy and accusations of it will always continue in these types of discussions. I also agree with Tim and Len regarding Jeff Durbin's avoidance tactics...and give another example of Jeff's unwillingness to engage the real debate with those who disagree.   Remember brethren, we can disagree with each other and be respectful while doing it!  Let's dive in! For more go to www.soteriology101.com

During an interview between John Piper and Matt Chandler the topic of soteriology came up and today we respectfully confront the perspective that was presented.  We get into the Calvinistic view of God's two opposing wills. We discuss the biblical doctrine of judicial hardening as in contrast with the Calvinistic conclusions about God's two opposing wills. Let's dive in.   For more information please visit us at www.soteriology101.com

A great Sound of the Saints episode where we answers Calvinistic questions and hear from you, our listeners. We look at John 10, where Jesus says, "I lay down my life for the sheep," and other arguments over the atonement of Christ.  Let's dive in!   For more information or to join in the conversation go to www.soteriology101.com

Since coming to faith in 1971 as a 16 year-old, heroin-shooting Jewish rock drummer, Dr. Michael Brown has devoted his life to fostering awakening in the Church, sparking moral and cultural revolution in the society, raising up gospel laborers for the nations, and reaching out to his own Jewish people. He is the host of the nationally syndicated Line of Fire radio broadcast, the president of FIRE School of Ministry, and a professor of Bible and Hebrew studies at several leading seminaries. He has preached in more than 25 nations and is the author of 25 books and numerous scholarly and popular articles. Dr. Brown has debated Jewish rabbis, agnostic professors, and gay activists on radio, TV, and college campuses, and he is widely considered to be the world’s foremost Messianic Jewish apologist. - See more at: https://askdrbrown.org Dr. Brown and Professor Flowers discuss the doctrine of election from the OT perspective along with many of the common Calvinistic objections to non-Calvinistic interpretation of th